Skip to free case review

Ozempic • GLP-1 GI Injuries • MDL 3094 • Updated August 2026

Ozempic Lawsuit 2026: MDL 3094, Gastroparesis & GLP-1 Claims

Ozempic lawsuit claims allege that manufacturers of GLP-1 medications failed to adequately warn patients and prescribers about serious gastrointestinal injuries, including gastroparesis and other severe digestive complications. The federal GI-injury litigation is centralized in MDL 3094 in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, and the manufacturers deny the allegations.

Quick answer: As of August 3, 2026, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation reports 3,928 actions pending in GLP-1 gastrointestinal-injury MDL 3094. The court has scheduled Rule 702 expert hearings for September 10–18, 2026. A separate GLP-1 proceeding, MDL 3163, addresses NAION vision-loss allegations and had 200 actions pending as of August 3, 2026. There is no publicly established universal Ozempic settlement amount.

3,928 PendingMDL 3094 GI actions as of Aug. 3, 2026

Gastroparesis FocusGI failure-to-warn allegations in MDL 3094

Sept. 10–18, 2026Rule 702 expert hearings scheduled

200 NAION ClaimsSeparate MDL 3163 as of Aug. 3, 2026

Last reviewedAugust 20, 2026
Source standardFederal court, JPML, FDA & NIH first
PurposeEducational information only

Start Here

Choose the Ozempic Lawsuit Information You Need

Use the lawsuit guide for eligibility and litigation status, then move to the matching calculator, settlement research or dated update when you need a narrower answer.

Primary sourcesCourts, JPML, FDA, NIH
2026 statusDated litigation facts
Clear intentGuide → calculator → updates

Lawsuit Overview

What the Ozempic Lawsuit Alleges

Federal GLP-1 gastrointestinal-injury cases allege that manufacturers knew or should have known that certain GLP-1 receptor agonists could cause gastroparesis and other serious gastrointestinal injuries, and that warnings or representations about those risks were inadequate. The Eastern District of Pennsylvania describes MDL 3094 as involving common questions concerning gastroparesis and other GI injuries, warnings to patients and prescribers, and allegedly false, misleading or incomplete safety representations. The Novo Nordisk defendants and Eli Lilly deny the allegations.

Evidence in ozempic lawsuits is worth most when it is gathered early, because records created close to the events carry more weight than the same facts reconstructed later.

Allegation

Failure to Warn

Plaintiffs contend that warnings did not adequately communicate the risk or severity of certain gastrointestinal complications during relevant periods.

Medical issue

Delayed Gastric Emptying

GLP-1 drugs can delay gastric emptying. Product labels also address severe GI reactions and gastroparesis-related precautions.

Defense position

Liability Is Disputed

The manufacturers contest liability. Medication use, diagnosis, alternative causes, warnings, causation and damages remain case-specific.

Important distinction: the existence of an MDL does not establish that a drug caused an individual patient’s condition, that a warning was legally inadequate in a particular case, or that a claimant is entitled to compensation.
Claim Screening

Who May Qualify for an Ozempic Lawsuit?

There is no single public eligibility rule that automatically determines whether someone has a viable Ozempic or GLP-1 claim. A case review generally considers medication use, diagnosis, symptom timing, medical history, treatment, warnings in effect at the time, state law and the evidence connecting the claimed injury to the drug.

There is no published per-claim figure for ozempic lawsuits as a category. What a claim is worth turns on the individual facts, the medical record and the law of the relevant state, so any single number quoted for ozempic lawsuits as a whole averages together unlike things.

Ozempic lawsuits are not decided on sympathy. They are decided on documents, and those documents are usually held by someone other than the claimant.

Medication Evidence

  • Pharmacy or prescription records identifying the GLP-1 medication.
  • Approximate start/stop dates and dose changes.
  • Prescribing clinician and treatment indication.

Injury Evidence

  • Documented gastroparesis or delayed gastric emptying.
  • Severe vomiting, dehydration, hospitalization or nutrition complications.
  • Intestinal obstruction, ileus or another serious documented GI injury.

Timing & Alternative Causes

Timing matters, but so can diabetes, prior GI disease, surgery, other medications and other potential causes of delayed gastric emptying.

Off-Label Use

Off-label use does not automatically decide whether a claim is valid. Product, warning history, diagnosis, causation and applicable state law still require case-specific review.

What ozempic lawsuits must establish before value is discussed, from the product or conduct through causation to the filing window
What ozempic lawsuits have to establish before anyone can sensibly discuss value.
Federal Litigation

Ozempic MDL 3094 Status in August 2026

GLP-1 gastrointestinal-injury cases are coordinated in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania before Judge Karen S. Marston as MDL No. 3094. As of August 3, 2026, JPML reports 3,928 pending actions and 3,962 historical actions.

Ozempic lawsuits are assessed individually rather than against any published schedule, because two people with similar facts can still reach different outcomes.

3,928pending GI actions in MDL 3094 as of Aug. 3, 2026
Sept. 10–182026 Rule 702 expert hearings scheduled
Oct. 13, 2026next listed status conference after the expert hearing
200pending NAION actions in separate MDL 3163

February 2024 — MDL 3094 Created

Federal GLP-1 gastrointestinal-injury cases were centralized for coordinated pretrial proceedings.

January 2026 — Streamlined Docket

The court created a related streamlined docket for master pleadings, core orders, dispositive motions and Rule 702 materials.

April 30, 2026 — Expert Schedule Amended

Case Management Order No. 32 scheduled Rule 702 hearings for September 10–18, 2026.

August 3, 2026 — 3,928 GI Actions Pending

JPML listed 3,928 pending MDL 3094 actions and 200 pending actions in separate NAION MDL 3163.

Separate NAION litigation: MDL 3163 is a separate proceeding for non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy claims. Do not combine its case count with MDL 3094 when describing GI litigation.
Medical Context

Gastroparesis and Other Gastrointestinal Injuries

The National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases defines gastroparesis, also called delayed gastric emptying, as a disorder that slows or stops movement of food from the stomach to the small intestine without a mechanical blockage. Symptoms can include early fullness, prolonged fullness after meals, nausea, vomiting, bloating and upper abdominal pain.

Every status, deadline and figure published on this page about ozempic lawsuits is traced to a primary source before it appears.

The value of ozempic lawsuits is not fixed at the moment of injury. It moves as evidence is gathered, as the science is tested in court and as defendants settle or refuse to.

Gastroparesis

Diagnosis generally requires more than symptoms alone. Clinicians may exclude obstruction and use testing that measures gastric emptying.

Severe Vomiting

Repeated vomiting can contribute to dehydration, electrolyte problems, weight loss, emergency treatment and hospitalization.

Nutrition Complications

Severe delayed gastric emptying may contribute to poor intake, malnutrition, weight loss and difficulty controlling blood glucose.

Medical caution: gastrointestinal symptoms can have many causes, and diabetes itself is a known cause of gastroparesis. Do not stop or change a prescribed GLP-1 medication based on lawsuit information; speak with a licensed healthcare professional.
Products in Litigation

GLP-1 Drugs Identified in the Federal GI Litigation

The Eastern District of Pennsylvania’s MDL 3094 description specifically identifies Ozempic, Wegovy, Rybelsus, Trulicity and Mounjaro when describing the centralized GI-injury cases. Product identity should be verified from pharmacy records rather than assumed from drug class alone.

Ozempic lawsuits are individual claims. Even where many are coordinated before one judge, each still has to prove its own facts, which is why ozempic lawsuits are not resolved as a single group.

Medication Active ingredient Manufacturer MDL 3094 court description
Ozempic Semaglutide Novo Nordisk Specifically identified
Wegovy Semaglutide Novo Nordisk Specifically identified
Rybelsus Semaglutide Novo Nordisk Specifically identified
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Eli Lilly Specifically identified
Trulicity Dulaglutide Eli Lilly Specifically identified
Zepbound and other related products: people who used a different GLP-1 or incretin medication should verify the exact drug, injury and current litigation posture rather than assuming every product follows the same MDL path.
Evidence used in ozempic lawsuits, from the primary record through medical documentation to regulatory data
The records that carry ozempic lawsuits, and the one that matters most.
FDA-Regulated Labeling

What the Current Ozempic Label Says About GI Risks

The current FDA-approved Ozempic prescribing information states that Ozempic use has been associated with gastrointestinal adverse reactions, sometimes severe, and that severe GI reactions have also been reported postmarketing with GLP-1 receptor agonists. The label states that Ozempic is not recommended in patients with severe gastroparesis.

The prescribing information also states that Ozempic delays gastric emptying and may affect absorption of oral medications. These statements are important regulatory and medical context, but they do not establish individualized legal causation by themselves.

Filing deadlines are the most common reason ozempic lawsuits fail before their merits are ever considered, and they are the one thing that cannot be repaired afterwards.

Anyone researching ozempic lawsuits should treat published figures with care. A number reported in the press is usually an aggregate, a single verdict or an estimate, and only rarely a per-claim value for ozempic lawsuits.

Claim Documentation

Evidence That May Matter in an Ozempic Lawsuit

Pharmacy Records

Prescription fills, dose changes and dates help document actual product exposure.

The strength of the documentary record is what separates ozempic lawsuits that proceed from those that stall, more than the severity of the injury alone.

Diagnostic Records

Gastric-emptying tests, endoscopy, imaging, hospital and specialist records may document the injury and alternatives.

Timeline Evidence

Symptom onset, dose escalation, discontinuation and clinical course can help evaluate timing.

Damages Records

Medical bills, wage loss, nutrition support and ongoing-care records may be relevant to damages.

Compensation Research

Ozempic Lawsuit Settlement Amounts and Value Factors

There is no publicly established universal Ozempic or GLP-1 settlement amount in MDL 3094. Published dollar figures should not be treated as an official average, court-approved matrix, settlement offer or guaranteed payout.

Where a defendant has reorganised or the available insurance is limited, the practical ceiling on ozempic lawsuits can be set by what there is to pay rather than by what was lost.

Where ozempic lawsuits are coordinated before a single judge, that judge manages discovery and the questions common to everyone. Individual questions of exposure, injury and damages still belong to each claim.

Confirmed vs. estimated: the MDL case count, court orders and FDA labeling are official-source facts. Individual settlement values are not publicly fixed. TortAdvisor’s calculator and Settlement Amounts hub are educational tools, not predictions of a case result.

Injury Severity

Documented gastroparesis, hospitalization, nutrition complications, procedures and permanent impairment may affect claimed damages.

Causation Evidence

Medical history, alternative causes, timing, dose history and expert evidence can materially affect the claim.

Economic Loss

Medical expenses, wage loss, reduced earning capacity and future care may be relevant where legally recoverable.

Warning History

The label and warning language in effect during the treatment period can matter to a failure-to-warn theory.

Jurisdiction

State product-liability law, deadlines and defenses can materially change claim value and viability.

Expert Rulings

Rule 702 rulings may affect which expert opinions can be used on common scientific or legal issues.

Where ozempic lawsuits are decided, across federal, state, benefit and settlement routes
Ozempic lawsuits do not all follow the same route, and the route shapes the outcome.
Claim Process

How an Ozempic or GLP-1 Injury Claim Is Evaluated

1

Identify the Drug

Confirm product, prescriber, pharmacy history and approximate dates.

Because ozempic lawsuits turn on facts that differ from person to person, general information about ozempic lawsuits is a starting point rather than an assessment of any individual claim.

2

Document the Injury

Collect diagnosis, testing, hospitalization and treatment records.

3

Review Causation

Consider diabetes, prior GI disease, surgery, other drugs and other causes.

4

Check Filing Rules

State-specific statutes and discovery rules can affect timing.

5

Determine Venue

A lawyer may assess federal MDL, state court or another forum.

6

Preserve Damages Proof

Keep records of medical expenses, work loss and ongoing limitations.

Filing Deadlines

Ozempic Lawsuit Statute of Limitations

There is no single nationwide filing deadline for every Ozempic or GLP-1 claim. Product-liability statutes of limitation vary by state, and the date a period begins can depend on injury, diagnosis, discovery, product use, defendant, jurisdiction and other facts.

This page describes how ozempic lawsuits generally work. It is not legal advice, and the only way to know how any of it applies to a particular situation is to ask a licensed attorney in the relevant state about ozempic lawsuits.

Do not rely on a generic “1–3 year” rule: state law can be shorter, longer or subject to discovery and tolling rules. Anyone concerned about a deadline should seek jurisdiction-specific legal advice promptly rather than waiting for a settlement or bellwether event.
Frequently Asked Questions

Ozempic Lawsuit FAQ

How many Ozempic and GLP-1 GI lawsuits are pending?

JPML’s August 3, 2026 report lists 3,928 actions pending in MDL 3094.

Has the Ozempic lawsuit settled?

There is no publicly established universal settlement amount or court-approved per-claim payout schedule for MDL 3094.

Can I file if Ozempic was prescribed off-label for weight loss?

Off-label prescribing does not automatically decide claim validity. Medication, injury, warning history, causation and state law remain important.

Is gastroparesis the same as ordinary nausea?

No. Gastroparesis is delayed gastric emptying without mechanical obstruction. Nausea and vomiting can occur for many reasons.

What is the difference between MDL 3094 and MDL 3163?

MDL 3094 coordinates GLP-1 gastrointestinal injury claims. MDL 3163 is a separate proceeding focused on NAION vision-loss allegations.

What is the next major MDL 3094 event?

Rule 702 expert hearings are scheduled for September 10–18, 2026, followed by the next listed status conference on October 13, 2026.

Primary source hierarchy for ozempic lawsuits research: controlling court, JPML, company filings, federal agencies and peer-reviewed science
How TortAdvisor sources the ozempic lawsuits research published on this page.
Primary Sources

Ozempic Lawsuit Sources and Official References

  1. JPML — Pending MDL Dockets by Actions Pending, August 3, 2026. Lists 3,928 pending actions in MDL 3094 and 200 in MDL 3163.
  2. Eastern District of Pennsylvania — MDL 3094 official page. Describes GI-injury allegations and defendants’ denials.
  3. Case Management Order No. 32. Schedules September 10–18, 2026 Rule 702 hearings.
  4. Amended 2026 Monthly Conference Schedule. Lists October 13, November 17 and December 15, 2026 conferences.
  5. Eastern District of Pennsylvania — MDL 3163. Separate GLP-1 NAION proceeding.
  6. FDA-approved Ozempic prescribing information. Severe GI reactions, severe gastroparesis and delayed gastric emptying.
  7. NIDDK — Gastroparesis Definition & Facts. Medical definition and complications.
Next Step

Request a Confidential Ozempic Case Review

If you used Ozempic or another GLP-1 medication and later developed a serious documented gastrointestinal injury, submit the medication, diagnosis, treatment and timing information you know now for review.

Legal and medical disclaimer: TortAdvisor.com is not a law firm and does not provide legal or medical advice. Lawsuit allegations are disputed unless and until established through settlement, judgment or other binding resolution. This page does not guarantee eligibility, representation, compensation or any outcome. Do not stop, start or change a medication because of lawsuit information. Speak with a licensed healthcare professional about symptoms, diagnosis and treatment. Submitting information does not create an attorney-client relationship.