Skip to free case review
Depo-Provera • Meningioma Claims • MDL 3140 • Updated August 2026

Depo-Provera Lawsuit 2026: MDL 3140 Settlement & Meningioma Claims

Depo-Provera lawsuit claims allege that repeated use of injectable medroxyprogesterone acetate was associated with intracranial meningioma and that adequate warnings were not provided during relevant periods. Federal cases are centralized in MDL 3140 in the Northern District of Florida, and the defendants dispute liability and individualized causation.

Quick answer: As of August 3, 2026, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation reports 6,294 actions pending in Depo-Provera MDL 3140. Federal court filings recognize a global agreement for pending plaintiffs who satisfy agreed eligibility criteria, but public court materials do not publish a universal per-claim payout schedule. The current FDA label includes a meningioma warning after repeated administration, primarily with long-term use.
6,294 PendingMDL 3140 actions as of Aug. 3, 2026
Global AgreementCourt-recognized; eligibility remains case-specific
FDA WarningMeningioma language added in Dec. 2025
Sept. 18, 2026CMC followed by Rule 702 hearing
Last reviewedAugust 20, 2026
Source standardCourt, JPML, FDA & peer review first
PurposeEducational information only
Start Here

Choose the Depo-Provera Lawsuit Information You Need

Start with eligibility or current MDL status, then move to settlement research, the calculator or the latest dated update.

Primary sourcesCourt, JPML, FDA, BMJ
2026 statusDated litigation facts
Clear intentGuide → calculator → updates
Lawsuit Overview

What Is the Depo-Provera Lawsuit About?

Depo-Provera is an injectable contraceptive containing medroxyprogesterone acetate. Plaintiffs allege that repeated use was associated with intracranial meningioma and that warnings provided during relevant periods were inadequate. The defendants dispute liability and may challenge causation, warning theories, product identification, timing and other elements of individual claims.

Allegation

Failure to Warn

Plaintiffs allege that relevant labeling and warnings did not adequately communicate the meningioma risk during portions of the exposure period.

Injury focus

Intracranial Meningioma

The federal litigation principally concerns meningioma allegations following depot medroxyprogesterone acetate use.

Defense position

Liability Is Disputed

Each plaintiff must still establish product use, injury, causation, damages and compliance with applicable filing rules.

Important distinction: MDL centralization coordinates common pretrial issues. It does not automatically establish liability, medical causation, eligibility or compensation for an individual claimant.
Potential Eligibility

Who May Qualify for a Depo-Provera Lawsuit?

Screening standards can change as the litigation and settlement process develop. A case may warrant review when several claim-specific facts are present.

Use & Timing

  • Documented use of Depo-Provera or another relevant depot medroxyprogesterone acetate injection.
  • Repeated or prolonged injections before the diagnosis.
  • Pharmacy, clinic, OB/GYN, insurance or administration records that help establish exposure.

Diagnosis & Treatment

  • A confirmed intracranial meningioma diagnosis.
  • Monitoring, surgery, radiation, rehabilitation or other documented treatment.
  • Neurological symptoms, disability or continuing surveillance.

Damages Evidence

Medical expenses, lost income, permanent deficits, future care, caregiving needs and reduced daily functioning may be relevant to a damages review.

Filing & Settlement Rules

Applicable statutes of limitation, settlement eligibility terms, proof requirements, jurisdiction and other claim-specific rules can affect whether a claim may proceed.

Avoid universal minimum-use claims: do not assume that one injection count or one duration threshold automatically determines eligibility without current settlement-program or law-firm screening rules.
Federal Litigation

Depo-Provera MDL 3140 Status and 2026 Timeline

Federal Depo-Provera products-liability cases are centralized before Judge M. Casey Rodgers in the Northern District of Florida under MDL No. 3140. The August 3, 2026 JPML report lists 6,294 actions pending and 6,394 historical actions in the proceeding.

6,294actions pending as of Aug. 3, 2026
Global agreementrecognized in federal court filings
Sept. 18, 2026CMC followed by Rule 702 hearing
Case-specificeligibility and damages are not automatic

March 2024 — BMJ Study

A national case-control study reported an association between prolonged injectable medroxyprogesterone acetate use and intracranial meningioma requiring surgery.

February 7, 2025 — MDL Centralization

JPML transferred federal cases to the Northern District of Florida for coordinated pretrial proceedings.

December 2025 — FDA Label Update

FDA-approved prescribing information added meningioma language to the warnings and precautions section.

June 2026 — Court Recognizes Global Agreement

Pretrial Order No. 30A states that pending MDL plaintiffs who meet agreed eligibility criteria will have an opportunity to resolve their claims. The order does not publish a universal individual payout schedule.

August 3, 2026 — 6,294 Actions Pending

JPML's monthly report lists 6,294 pending and 6,394 historical actions in MDL 3140.

September 18, 2026 — CMC + Rule 702 Hearing

The court's current MDL page lists a case-management conference at 9:00 a.m. CT followed by the Rule 702 motions hearing.

Settlement Update

Depo-Provera Lawsuit Settlement Agreement and Value Factors

Federal court filings recognize a global agreement involving plaintiffs' lead counsel and Pfizer-related defendants. Pretrial Order No. 30A states that pending MDL plaintiffs who satisfy agreed eligibility criteria will have an opportunity to resolve their claims. Public court materials available on the court's MDL page do not provide one universal per-claim payout chart or reliable average settlement amount.

Confirmed vs. estimated: the existence of the agreement, the federal MDL, current hearing dates and the August 3, 2026 case count can be tied to official sources. Individual eligibility, deductions, liens, net recovery and claim-specific payment amounts require program- and case-specific review.
Educational Claim TierCommon CharacteristicsImportant Value Factors
Severe injury reviewCraniotomy, recurrence, major neurological deficit, substantial disability or wrongful death.Surgery, pathology, permanent impairment, future care, earning loss, dependency and strong proof of use.
Moderate-to-severe reviewRadiation, meaningful symptoms, substantial treatment, work limitations or continuing neurological care.Treatment burden, symptoms, medical expenses, wage loss, prognosis and functional impact.
Monitoring / lower-damage reviewConfirmed meningioma managed through surveillance, limited symptoms or no invasive treatment to date.Tumor size/location, monitoring burden, symptoms, future risk and strength of causation evidence.
Medical Research

What Does the Research Say About Depo-Provera and Meningioma?

A 2024 national case-control study published in The BMJ reported an association between prolonged use of injectable medroxyprogesterone acetate and intracranial meningioma requiring surgery. For prolonged medroxyprogesterone acetate exposure, the study reported an odds ratio of approximately 5.62. Because the research was observational, it identified an association and did not establish that Depo-Provera caused every individual tumor.

Exposure

Documented Injection History

Pharmacy records, clinic notes, OB/GYN records and administration logs may help establish product use and duration.

Diagnosis

Confirmed Meningioma

MRI, CT, operative notes, pathology, radiation records and neurosurgical reports may establish injury and treatment.

Timing

Use Before Diagnosis

The sequence and duration of Depo-Provera use relative to tumor detection are central to individualized review.

Regulatory Update

FDA Depo-Provera Meningioma Label Update

The current FDA-approved prescribing information states that meningioma cases have been reported following repeated administration of medroxyprogesterone acetate, primarily with long-term use. The label directs clinicians to monitor for signs and symptoms of meningioma and to discontinue Depo-Provera CI if a meningioma is diagnosed.

Accuracy note: the meningioma language appears in the warnings and precautions section. It is not the subject of the product's boxed warning, which addresses loss of bone mineral density.
Medical Context

What Is a Meningioma?

A meningioma develops from the meninges, the membranes surrounding the brain and spinal cord. Many meningiomas are histologically benign, but size and location can still cause serious neurological problems or require significant treatment.

Possible Symptoms

Headaches, seizures, vision or hearing changes, weakness, memory problems, balance issues or personality changes.

Diagnosis

MRI and CT imaging are commonly used. Pathology may confirm tumor type and grade after surgery.

Treatment

Monitoring, surgery, radiation, medication, rehabilitation or a combination may be considered depending on the tumor.

Long-Term Impact

Some patients experience recurrence, neurological deficits, reduced earning ability, ongoing surveillance or future-care needs.

Claim Preparation

Evidence Commonly Reviewed in a Depo-Provera Claim

Proof of Use

Pharmacy records, injection logs, clinic records, insurance claims, Planned Parenthood records, OB/GYN records and prescribing-provider notes.

Medical Evidence

MRI and CT reports, pathology, operative notes, radiation records, neurology/neurosurgery notes, medications and rehabilitation records.

Damages Evidence

Medical bills, wage records, disability documentation, travel expenses, caregiving costs and evidence of daily-life limitations.

Filing Process

How a Depo-Provera Lawsuit May Be Evaluated and Filed

1

Initial Screening

Review product use, diagnosis, treatment, dates, jurisdiction and possible deadlines.

2

Collect Records

Gather injection, pharmacy, imaging, pathology, surgery, radiation, wage and damages records.

3

Legal & Medical Review

Evaluate product identification, causation, warning issues, damages and applicable law.

4

File When Appropriate

A retained attorney may file an individual lawsuit and comply with MDL requirements where applicable.

5

Discovery & Experts

The parties exchange evidence and litigate common and case-specific scientific or legal issues.

6

Resolution

A claim may be dismissed, settled, remanded or tried. No particular result is guaranteed.

Time Limits

Depo-Provera Lawsuit Filing Deadlines

Statutes of limitations vary by state and can depend on diagnosis, discovery of a possible connection, product use, residence, prescription location, defendant conduct, minority, incapacity, wrongful death and other facts.

Do not rely on a generic deadline: a missed statute of limitations may bar a claim. Anyone concerned about timing should obtain jurisdiction-specific legal advice promptly rather than waiting for a settlement announcement or hearing.
Frequently Asked Questions

Depo-Provera Lawsuit FAQ

Is there a Depo-Provera class action lawsuit?

Federal cases are coordinated in MDL 3140, not a traditional class action paying every claimant the same amount. Plaintiffs retain individual claims and must establish their own use, injury, causation, damages and deadlines.

Has the Depo-Provera lawsuit reached a settlement?

Federal court filings recognize a global agreement for pending MDL plaintiffs who meet agreed eligibility criteria. Public court materials do not establish one guaranteed payout or universal average settlement for every claimant.

What diagnosis is central to the litigation?

The federal litigation principally concerns intracranial meningioma allegations following depot medroxyprogesterone acetate use.

How much could a Depo-Provera claim be worth?

Potential value can depend on treatment, surgery, neurological deficits, recurrence, future care, wage loss, age, proof of use, causation evidence, jurisdiction and the actual settlement-program rules.

What records help prove Depo-Provera use?

Pharmacy claims, clinic injection logs, OB/GYN records, Planned Parenthood records, insurance records and prescribing-provider notes may help establish use.

Should someone stop Depo-Provera without medical advice?

Medical and contraceptive decisions should be discussed with a licensed healthcare professional. The current FDA label directs discontinuation if meningioma is diagnosed.

What if the injections came from a clinic?

Clinic and provider records may be important proof of use. The proper defendants, theories and evidence still depend on the facts and applicable law.

How quickly should a potential claim be reviewed?

Promptly. Filing deadlines vary and can depend on state-specific discovery rules and individual facts. Waiting for a settlement announcement may create deadline risk.

Primary Sources

Depo-Provera Lawsuit Sources and Official References

Current litigation claims on this page are tied to primary federal court, JPML and FDA materials. Peer-reviewed research provides medical context and does not establish individualized legal or medical causation.

  1. U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida — Depo-Provera MDL 3140. Official litigation page and current hearing schedule. Accessed August 20, 2026.
  2. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation — Pending MDL Reports. August 3, 2026 report lists 6,294 pending actions in MDL 3140. Accessed August 20, 2026.
  3. Northern District of Florida — Pretrial Order No. 30A. Discusses the global agreement and how pending Rule 702/preemption matters interact with participating and nonparticipating claims. Accessed August 20, 2026.
  4. Northern District of Florida — MDL 3140 Orders by Date. Official order index. Accessed August 20, 2026.
  5. FDA-approved Depo-Provera CI and depo-subQ provera 104 prescribing information. Current meningioma warning and precautions. Accessed August 20, 2026.
  6. FDA supplement approval letter dated December 12, 2025. Approval of meningioma risk information. Accessed August 20, 2026.
  7. Roland N, et al. Use of progestogens and the risk of intracranial meningioma. The BMJ, 2024. Accessed August 20, 2026.
  8. PubMed record for the 2024 national case-control study. Bibliographic and study abstract information. Accessed August 20, 2026.
Next Step

Request a Confidential Depo-Provera Case Review

If you used Depo-Provera and were later diagnosed with a meningioma, submit the injection, diagnosis, treatment and timing information you know now for review.

Legal and medical disclaimer: TortAdvisor.com is not a law firm and does not provide legal or medical advice. Lawsuit allegations are disputed unless and until established through settlement, judgment or another binding resolution. This page does not guarantee eligibility, representation, compensation, settlement participation or any outcome. Do not stop, start or change a medication because of lawsuit information. Speak with a licensed healthcare professional about contraception, symptoms, diagnosis and treatment. Submitting information does not create an attorney-client relationship.