Table of Contents

Judge Sargus has denied the plaintiffs’ motion for remand, as discussed in our September 5 update. The judge explained that there is a limited stay in effect, as outlined in Case Management Orders 52 and 53 (referenced in the July 6 update), which prohibits any motions or remand requests during this period. Since the motion was filed while the stay was in place, the Court denied the motion without prejudice.

While this ruling was expected, it would have been beneficial to see Bard’s response to the motion, as it likely would have included comments on the ongoing settlement negotiations. Many plaintiffs have been left in the dark for too long, and any insight into the settlement process would have been valuable.

Enter a 10-digit phone number with digits only (e.g., 1234567890)

By clicking the ‘Get a Free Review’ button, I hereby grant consent to be contacted at the phone number above for marketing purposes by Tort Advisor and its partners. I understand this may include an automated calling system, artificial voice, pre-recorded message, or an SMS text message. I consent even if my phone number provided is registered on the Federal or State ‘Do Not Call Registry’. I acknowledge that standard message and data rates may apply. Message frequency varies. Text HELP for help. Text STOP to cancel. Clicking ‘Get a Free Review’ constitutes my electronic signature for authorization to be contacted and my agreement to the Terms and Conditions and [Privacy Policy]. This authorization is not required to qualify for, purchase goods, or receive services.

Partners Off-Canvas (Hidden)