Table of Contents

Lawyers are in disagreement over deadlines related to privilege log disputes and document production. Plaintiffs argue that Uber’s privilege logs, which include thousands of entries, are overly broad and wrongly classify business communications as privileged. They suspect Uber is shielding non-privileged documents by simply copying lawyers on them. In response, Plaintiffs proposed a revised deposition schedule to allow more time for challenging these designations. Uber, however, contends that most of its designations are valid and argues that depositions should proceed without delay. The parties remain at an impasse, with Plaintiffs seeking more flexibility and Uber pushing for coordination with California state court proceedings.

Enter a 10-digit phone number with digits only (e.g., 1234567890)

By clicking the ‘Get a Free Review’ button, I hereby grant consent to be contacted at the phone number above for marketing purposes by Tort Advisor and its partners. I understand this may include an automated calling system, artificial voice, pre-recorded message, or an SMS text message. I consent even if my phone number provided is registered on the Federal or State ‘Do Not Call Registry’. I acknowledge that standard message and data rates may apply. Message frequency varies. Text HELP for help. Text STOP to cancel. Clicking ‘Get a Free Review’ constitutes my electronic signature for authorization to be contacted and my agreement to the Terms and Conditions and [Privacy Policy]. This authorization is not required to qualify for, purchase goods, or receive services.

Partners Off-Canvas (Hidden)