Discussions surrounding the ongoing Hair Relaxer MDL are progressing as both plaintiffs and defendants move closer toward potential settlement talks.
Plaintiffs’ attorneys are maintaining a cautious stance, though all parties are eager to see these cases resolved and ensure victims receive some form of justice. There is a growing interest among plaintiffs to discuss the selection of a mediator. However, plaintiffs are resisting the defendants’ request to establish a formal mediation process at this early stage.
The defense attorneys contend that meaningful settlement discussions cannot commence until plaintiffs provide a comprehensive theory of liability for each defendant’s role in the alleged injuries. They have suggested a 45-day window for exchanging case theories after a mediator is chosen. But ultimately, the main goal is clear: we need a mediator and must first agree on the financial terms before considering a bellwether trial. It’s that straightforward.
Despite procedural disagreements, both sides seem to agree on the March 20, 2025, deadline for selecting a mediator. If successful, this could pave the way for early-stage settlement talks in what is anticipated to be a complex and high-stakes resolution.
As settlement negotiations continue to unfold, the upcoming weeks will be crucial in determining whether talks gain real momentum, or if extended litigation—including bellwether trials—becomes unavoidable. The next significant update is expected after the March 27, 2025, Case Management Conference.
Is there optimism for a hair relaxer settlement in the coming months? Not yet. While we would love to be proven wrong, history suggests that it’s difficult to reach a deal until we get closer to the trial date. Of course, we’d love to be wrong.
