The court conducted a video status hearing to address the plaintiffs’ ongoing concerns regarding Revlon’s responses to interrogatories. Some progress was made during the hearing. Regarding issues with “inconsistent naming conventions” in product references, the plaintiffs are required to submit a list of unclear responses to Revlon by January 29, 2025. Revlon must then either amend its responses or confirm its inability to identify certain products by February 18, 2025. A similar process will be applied to concerns related to ambiguous production dates.

For issues concerning the Bills of Materials spreadsheet and finished product IDs, the parties are expected to meet and discuss these issues in detail, either via video conference or in person, and include any unresolved matters in the joint status report due by February 6, 2025.

The court determined that Revlon is not required to link its document productions directly to its interrogatory responses as a general rule. However, the plaintiffs may address any perceived discrepancies during the depositions of Revlon representatives.